<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle and Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bill.burkecentral.com/2009/04/22/oracle-and-java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bill.burkecentral.com/2009/04/22/oracle-and-java/</link>
	<description>Software plumbing using middleware wrenches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: billburke</title>
		<link>http://bill.burkecentral.com/2009/04/22/oracle-and-java/#comment-2623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billburke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.burkecentral.com/?p=221#comment-2623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no idea John.  End of the world conspiracies rarely happen though.  Even with Oracle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea John.  End of the world conspiracies rarely happen though.  Even with Oracle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Harby</title>
		<link>http://bill.burkecentral.com/2009/04/22/oracle-and-java/#comment-2622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Harby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.burkecentral.com/?p=221#comment-2622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder what exactly will happen to the JCP. Being a member, I know any agreements I signed with them were executed with &quot;Sun Microsystems&quot; and not the &quot;JCP&quot; or some independent organization. Would that give Oracle full control over the JCP and could they remove whomever they chose?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what exactly will happen to the JCP. Being a member, I know any agreements I signed with them were executed with &#8220;Sun Microsystems&#8221; and not the &#8220;JCP&#8221; or some independent organization. Would that give Oracle full control over the JCP and could they remove whomever they chose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billburke</title>
		<link>http://bill.burkecentral.com/2009/04/22/oracle-and-java/#comment-2598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billburke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.burkecentral.com/?p=221#comment-2598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Enrique:

I don&#039;t think a totally open Java or Java EE is the best idea.  You need a benevolent dictator with a good vision to push things through when have political resistence to a new specification or idea.  A prime example is JPA.  JPA would have never been part of EE 5 if Sun hadn&#039;t rammed it through.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Enrique:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a totally open Java or Java EE is the best idea.  You need a benevolent dictator with a good vision to push things through when have political resistence to a new specification or idea.  A prime example is JPA.  JPA would have never been part of EE 5 if Sun hadn&#8217;t rammed it through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Enrique Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://bill.burkecentral.com/2009/04/22/oracle-and-java/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C. Enrique Ortiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.burkecentral.com/?p=221#comment-2588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the IBM match better, as from the licensing perspective they were very open current model is broken and needed to get rid of and Java be open. With IBM I thought the possibility of Java going totally open under an Eclipse or Apache license was a real possibility. I can&#039;t say the same about Oracle.

ceo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the IBM match better, as from the licensing perspective they were very open current model is broken and needed to get rid of and Java be open. With IBM I thought the possibility of Java going totally open under an Eclipse or Apache license was a real possibility. I can&#8217;t say the same about Oracle.</p>
<p>ceo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Pereira</title>
		<link>http://bill.burkecentral.com/2009/04/22/oracle-and-java/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruno Pereira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bill.burkecentral.com/?p=221#comment-2576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of questions arise, but I think the Java platform will be just fine.

Something I&#039;m wondering is who&#039;ll buy Red Hat/JBoss. Considering that HP bought EDS last year, I think it makes a lot of sense for them to acquire Red Hat/JBoss and get their solid software stack. It&#039;d be a bargain for HP and it&#039;d give them the chance to compete with IBM, Oracle and Microsoft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of questions arise, but I think the Java platform will be just fine.</p>
<p>Something I&#8217;m wondering is who&#8217;ll buy Red Hat/JBoss. Considering that HP bought EDS last year, I think it makes a lot of sense for them to acquire Red Hat/JBoss and get their solid software stack. It&#8217;d be a bargain for HP and it&#8217;d give them the chance to compete with IBM, Oracle and Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

