Comments on: Mark’s rebuttal on compensations with REST and JBPM http://bill.burkecentral.com/2007/09/18/marks-rebuttal-on-compensations-with-rest-and-jbpm/ Software plumbing using middleware wrenches Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:51:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Shashank http://bill.burkecentral.com/2007/09/18/marks-rebuttal-on-compensations-with-rest-and-jbpm/#comment-2918 Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:08:58 +0000 http://bill.burkecentral.com/2007/09/18/marks-rebuttal-on-compensations-with-rest-and-jbpm/#comment-2918 Being a big fan of Bill…I think REST is awesome and Bill has a point when he drives the whole idea of modelling the transactions. Great job Bill

]]> By: Andy http://bill.burkecentral.com/2007/09/18/marks-rebuttal-on-compensations-with-rest-and-jbpm/#comment-295 Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:43:46 +0000 http://bill.burkecentral.com/2007/09/18/marks-rebuttal-on-compensations-with-rest-and-jbpm/#comment-295 I use whatever transport requires me to do the least amount of work and does not hamper performance. For email the objects are simple, the data is big, I use XML because the platform has direct support for it and I have to do little if anything. If I were passing a lot of small objects, tree structures and using a JIT, I’d use something like JSON or preserialized objects. If it feels good do it. If it hurts don’t do it. Sucking up 20,000 WS specs to send an object across the net, transaction or not, hurts performance and development time. Until I don’t have to try real hard, forget it.

]]> By: dbrum http://bill.burkecentral.com/2007/09/18/marks-rebuttal-on-compensations-with-rest-and-jbpm/#comment-232 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:33:21 +0000 http://bill.burkecentral.com/2007/09/18/marks-rebuttal-on-compensations-with-rest-and-jbpm/#comment-232 Bill, you might want to check out Dan Diephouse’s blog on the same subject area: http://netzooid.com/blog/2007/08/19/ease-of-development-rest-vs-rpc/

Oh, and sorry about the Jays – they have no business playing baseball anymore ;-)

]]>